Information Every Business Needs to Know
BenefitsEssentials.com
May/June 2007 Newsletter

Brought to you by:

 
AxisPointe, Inc.
Employee Benefit Services
2001 Rt. 46 Suite 504A / Parsippany, NJ 07054
Phone: 973-299-0022 / Fax: 973-299-0097

 

In This Issue

Spotlight on USERRA

Section 409A Final Regs Issued

How to Correct the Reporting of Misclassified Employees


HR & Benefits
in the News

WORKPLACE
Military Personnel Have Job Protection Rights When Called To Duty. Shaw Valenza LLP
 
What's up with the slow growth in workers' pay? When Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke testifies on Capitol Hill Wednesday and Thursday he will likely be peppered with questions about why wages are not rising at a more rapid pace. USA Today

Restaurant owners stew over new rules. Industry fears costs of minimum wage boost, sick leave, health care will hurt trade. SF Gate

Hospitality: Are Your Employees’ Records A Ticking Time Bomb? Fisher & Phillips, LLP

State Employment Law News

What’s new in Employment Law


EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Health Care Law Alert: Time to Apply for a National Provider Identifier. Pepper Hamilton LLP
 
IRS Releases First Pension Protection Act Guidance . Littler Mendelson, P.C.

DOL, Treasury & HHS Issue Final HIPAA Wellness Program Rules . Christy Tinnes


HUMAN RESOURCES
Benefits of employee handbooks . If I do decide to have a handbook, what are some of the basic policies that it should contain? Monterey County Herald

Five Steps to Updating Sexual Harassment Prevention Training . Educating Supervisors Is Key to Complying With State Law AB1825. San Diego Business Journal


INSURANCE
NAIC Launches Spanish Language Insurance Education Web Site

NAIC Develops Strategic Framework To Benefit State Based Regulation

Homeowners Insurance Report

Bank Insurance News


 

Be sure to check out the Tax and Financial Planning section in BenefitsEssentials and our NewsBlog for late-breaking Tax, benefits and HR News.


Spotlight on:

The Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act of 1994 ( USERRA)

Excerpted from the USERRA section on BenefitsEssentials.com

Many employees deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan will be returning to work over the coming months. Do you know their rights– and your responsibilities as an employer?

Summary of the Law
The Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA ) protects veterans who have left an employment position (other than a temporary position) to perform training or service in the armed forces (Coast Guard personnel are treated equally with other uniformed service personnel). USERRA, which replaces the old Veteran's Re-employment Rights statute. USERRA covers nearly all employees, including part-time and probationary employees. USERRA applies to virtually all U.S. employers, regardless of size.

USERRA provides that an employee or his or her dependents who have coverage under an employer's health plan must be offered continuation coverage after commencement of military service. With the exception of service-connected conditions as determined by the secretary of veterans' affairs, if coverage under the health plan is terminated because of military service, an exclusion or waiting period may not be imposed on the employee (or family member) when the employee is re-employed.

Moreover, the Veterans Benefits Improvement Act (Public Law No: 108-454 ) modified and extended housing, education, and other benefits for veterans.

For Additional Information:

For more on USERRA, see the DOL USERRA site or contact your local VETS office.

Back to top


Final Regulations Issued Under Section 409A On Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

On April 10, 2007, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") and the Department of the Treasury issued final regulations under Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.  Section 409A was added to the Code by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 and is generally effective for compensation deferred on or after January 1, 2005, under certain nonqualified deferred compensation plans and arrangements ("nonqualified plans").
 
Amounts subject to Section 409A that are deferred under a nonqualified plan are subject to current income taxation unless the nonqualified plan complies in form and in operation with the election, distribution, and acceleration requirements of Section 409A.  If a nonqualified plan fails to comply with these requirements at any time during a taxable year, all amounts deferred under the plan for that year and all preceding taxable years, by each participant to whom the failure relates, are included in the participant's gross income in the taxable year in which the failure occurred, to the extent such amounts are vested and were not previously included in income.  Further, such amounts are subject to an additional 20 percent penalty tax plus interest at an enhanced rate on any resulting tax underpayments.
 
The IRS issued initial guidance under Section 409A in Notice 2005-1 (Dec. 20, 2004), and published notice of proposed regulations under Section 409A for public comment on October 4, 2005.  These notices and other interim guidance issued by the IRS also included transition relief and transition guidance on which taxpayers could rely to show good faith compliance with Section 409A prior to the effective date of final regulations under Section 409A.

Documentary Compliance.   The provisions of the final regulations that may have the greatest significance to the broadest number of employers are the provisions relating to documentary compliance.  The final regulations make it clear that the document establishing a nonqualified plan subject to Section 409A must include terms that embody the limitations on deferral elections and distributions that are imposed by Section 409A.  Furthermore, the IRS has not extended the December 31, 2007, deadline for documentary compliance.  Thus, any nonqualified plan under which compensation has been deferred but not paid as of January 1, 2008, will be out of compliance on that date with respect to such compensation unless the plan is amended as necessary to conform to the requirements of the final regulations on or before December 31, 2007.

A Few Substantial Changes.  For the most part, the final regulations appear to follow the proposed regulations, but they also differ from the proposed regulations in a few significant respects.  One example is a change in the way nonqualified plans are categorized for purposes of treating a compliance failure with respect to one plan as a compliance failure with respect to all other plans of a similar type.  Earlier guidance, including the proposed regulations, divided nonqualified deferred compensation plans into four categories for this purpose: account balance plans; non-account balance plans; separation pay arrangements; and all other plans.  The final regulations divide nonqualified plans into additional categories: elective account balance plans; non-elective account balance plans; non-account balance plans; separation pay plans; split dollar life insurance arrangements; plans providing for in-kind benefits or reimbursement of expenses; foreign plans; stock rights; and a catch-all category.

Limited Exceptions to Certain Rules in Prior Guidance.  The final regulations provide a handful of new exceptions to rules established by prior guidance - either explicitly or by liberalizing a general rule - but many of these exceptions appear to be narrow.  For example, under prior guidance, the anti-acceleration prohibition arguably would have been violated by adding a provision to an existing nonqualified plan for a distribution on death, disability, or an unforeseen emergency.  The final regulations specify certain limited circumstances in which the addition of these alternative payment events will not be treated as violating the anti-acceleration rule.  Similarly, the final regulations include several provisions dealing with stock options and stock appreciation rights that broaden the scope of certain exemptions from coverage under Section 409A.

New Topics Covered by the Final Regulations .  The final regulations address several topics that were not explicitly addressed in the proposed regulations.  For example, the final regulations establish a general rule and a safe harbor for treating a voluntary termination for good reason as an involuntary termination in the context of applying Section 409A to separation pay arrangements.  The final regulations also adopt specific rules for determining whether a right to a tax gross up payment satisfies the fixed time and form of payment requirements under Section 409A.

Some Questions Remain Unanswered . The final regulations do not address every topic arising under Section 409A.  For example, the final regulations do not address: the calculation or timing of amounts required to be included in income under Section 409A(a); the application of Section 409A to arrangements between partnerships and partners; or certain topics on which questions were posed during the comment period which followed publication of the proposed regulations, such as when a leave program will be treated as a bona fide sick leave or vacation leave plan for purposes of Section 409A.

The final regulations are generally applicable for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2008, but may be relied on with respect to taxable years beginning prior to that date.

Source: OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.

Back to top


How to Correct Reporting of Misclassified Employees

IRS Offers Tips on How to Correct Reporting of Misclassified Employees

One of the most important factors for meeting employment tax obligations is to accurately classify workers as either employees or independent contractors.

Occasionally, employers incorrectly classify an employee as an independent contractor. If you think you may have made this mistake, the IRS can help. 

Most employers make every effort to meet their employment tax obligations. They take the care to review all factors affecting their relationship with their workers and classify their workers as employees or independent contractors accordingly. Occasionally, an employer does make an error and classifies an employee as an independent contractor and has to correct that mistake.

Caution: Employee misclassification can affect retirement plan coverage, vesting and funding.  Relief may also be available for retirement plans.  Information about the IRS correction programs that enable sponsors of retirement plans to preserve the tax benefits of their plans is available on the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (EPCRS) pages of IRS.gov.

When an employer does incorrectly classify an employee as an independent contractor, the employer is still responsible for paying the employee’s federal income tax withholding and the employee’s share of Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA)/Railroad Retirement Tax Act (RRTA), even if it was not withheld from the employee’s wages. The employer still must pay the employer’s share of matching FICA/RRTA and Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA). Penalties and interest may also apply.

All of these payments can add up for the employer, but the good news is that the Internal Revenue Service does provide some relief for employers who have made a classification error. Internal Revenue Code Section (IRC §) 3509 provides an opportunity to correct the tax treatment of misclassified employees.  IRC § 3509 provides reduced rates for the employee’s share of FICA taxes and for the federal income tax that should have been withheld.  Employers are still responsible for the full amount of their share of FICA taxes.  IRC § 3509 does not provide a reduced rate for FUTA.

For Additional Information:

Additional information about worker misclassification and correction is available in Publication 1976, Section 530 Employment Tax Relief Requirements (PDF) and in Publication 15-A, Employer's Supplemental Tax Guide .  Both publications are available on IRS.gov.

Back to top

 

 

This newsletter is created by:

BenefitsEssentials.com
1 Dock Street, Suite 302
Stamford, CT 06902
Phone: (203) 977-8100 x115
Fax: (203) 977-7825